Archive for the ‘China’ Category

Stop China Bashing

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010
This entry is part 6 of 6 in the series China

A Guest Commentary by Patrick Mattimore

U.S. President Barack Obama told Zhang Yesui, China’s new Ambassador to the U.S., that the President is determined to improve his country’s relationship with China. Despite some warming of relations between the two countries in recent days, President Obama should start by reviewing just how nasty and unfounded U.S. rhetoric towards China has become.

A good place for America’s President to begin his inquiry is with some of the editorial pages from America’s leading newspapers. The top five newspapers according to circulation numbers are: “The Wall Street Journal, (WSJ)” “USA Today,” (USAT) “The New York Times, (NYT)” the “Los Angeles Times,” (LAT) and the “Washington Post,” (WP).

Those newspapers consistently bash China. Even a recent story about the economic success of China’s Hainan Island, which appeared in The NYT, characterized the “success” as being emblematic of China’s excesses.

Here are some of the other nuggets the newspapers are throwing out lately.

China has an undervalued currency which threatens the world’s economy. This recurrent drumbeat is apparently meant to deflect attention from the fact that America’s policies precipitated the world’s worst financial crisis in seventy years.

China’s aid to foreign countries is characterized as a means by which China can exert its influence elsewhere. Whether or not that is so, American foreign aid always comes with strings attached. (more…)

Share This Post

Was It Corporate Ethics Or Politics?

Thursday, March 25th, 2010
This entry is part 5 of 6 in the series China

Old Codger

The Old Codger

Google has found many supporters in America with its decision to move its search engine from mainland China to Hong Kong.  More often than not, it is being hailed as a savvy, corporate hero for having the gonads to stand up to Beijing in a row over Internet censorship.  Taking all the commentaries together, the general consensus seems to be that perhaps Google has wedged open the door for democratic reform in China.

With great acumen, Google has refrained from saying much of anything throughout the entire debacle.  No one at Google is making any comments of substance.  It says it does not wish to politicize the issues or points of contention.  Beijing is saying the same thing, in as few words as possible. Google of course, wishes to continue doing business in China, though on a more limited basis than in the past, thus a good reason for its diplomacy.

It is not surprising that this fiasco has given significant numbers of Americans numerous opportunities to ratchet up their anti-China rhetoric.  The majority of Americans believe strongly that the entire Chinese government is abominable at the very least.  They want to see China adopt American freedoms.  Many are now also bringing into the argument the trade imbalances, the undervalued Yuan and other economic factors, and blaming China for the economic woes America is now facing.  China becomes a scape goat.

Whether Google has acted out of conscience solely about the censorship issue, or for political favor in America is the question.  The entire fiasco began after China took a firm stand when Obama visited China in November 2009.   Many in America believed that Beijing was out of line for standing up to Washington and saying “no” very firmly.  Beijing, after years of kowtowing to Washington finally stood up.  That of course is totally unacceptable to Americans.

Google, in explaining its seemingly sudden epiphany about censorship in China, blamed Chinese hackers for trying to hack into its servers and some dissidents e-mail accounts.  What Google does not disclose is that there are continual hacking attempts from around the world on their servers and people’s e-mail accounts.  Could it be that Google, after four years of providing censored Internet search results in compliance with Chinese law with few complaints, felt a surge of American patriotism in light of China snubbing Washington?

With some, there is speculation that Washington may have been complicit in Google’s decision.  Conspiracy theories are interesting, but this one would be extremely difficult, if not impossible to prove, so it must be completely ignored as it involves only speculation that could be harmful to American interests.

Google of course is content to stand on its new position as being viewed as a responsible corporate entity in regards to censorship and free speech, and thus a strong proponent of human rights.   It has received strong kudos from the White House and Congress, which certainly cannot harm Google in the future when it is scrutinized on any number of different issues such as acquisitions which might appear to create a monopoly, or on copyright issues.

Google regularly censors search engine results in numerous countries around the world including in Europe, Australia and Thailand.  From a parochial standpoint, it would seem that if Google is truly opposed to censorship, it would cease all censorship throughout the world. Many countries also censor access to web sites on their own so that if Google does not censor an entry, a questionable  website may be blocked anyway. (more…)

Share This Post

A Letter to Google

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010
This entry is part 4 of 6 in the series China

Dear Google:

Today you took a poignant stand against Beijing.  To you, it was a principled stand based upon your belief that the Internet should be free of government control.  Since you have been silent on the entire dispute after you initially howled at the moon earlier in the year, it is difficult to state conclusively what your intentions are.

No doubt though, you have the full support of Washington, human rights activists around the world, and those who fervently hate China.  Could the next step be a Congressional Medal of Honor for spitting in Beijing’s face?

When you entered the market in China, no doubt your primary intentions were to make a buck or two.  Nothing wrong with that.  You state that you still want to keep that option despite you no longer being willing to play by all the rules that you agreed to play by when you entered the Chinese market.

Over the years, my momma taught me many lessons.  One of those lessons was that when I was a guest in someone else’s home, I had to abide by their rules without question.  If I couldn’t do that, I was to pick up all my toys and get out of that house.  As I got older, and began traveling around the country and the world, I was reminded of that lesson many times.  American arrogance, and the insistence that others adopt what American’s think and believe has no place when visiting another person’s home or country.

What you discovered after howling at the Chinese moon was that basically, the majority of the Chinese people do not really care much about the censorship issue.  Oh, a few do; no doubt about that.  However, those few dissidents do not speak for the majority of the Chinese people.  What that means is that you are pandering to a small minority in China and a lot of other people outside of China, that most Chinese people wish would keep their noses out of China’s internal affairs.

Now, personally, I don’t care what your dispute is with Beijing.  I believe that it shows a tremendous lack of understanding of China and Chinese culture.  The fact remains that you came to China agreeing to play the game according to their rules.  You are now blatantly breaking those rules, and in the process potentially causing problems for others.

Prior to this morning, I was able to access Google.com and get your servers in the US.  I could access Google in England.  I could access Google anyplace in the world.  Now, in your great act of defiance against Beijing, you are now forcing me to use only Google in Hong Kong.  I cannot access any other Google portal in the world.  So, in effect, you are censoring me.

Why you are blocking anyone from accessing any of your other servers around the world is a mystery.  It hardly makes sense.  If you are so opposed to censorship, it would seem to be prudent to allow your site visitors access to all of your products.

Of course, there is some hypocrisy in your actions.  You say that you do not want to play by Beijing’s rules.  Yet, you still want the Chinese to support you and your business ventures in China.  You are more than willing to take money from the presumed (in your belief) oppressed people of China, but not play by the established rules.

We do not know how Beijing is going to respond to your defiant act of moving your server to Hong Kong, simply because your search results are not censored there.  The most talked about option is for Beijing to simply block access to all Google products.  That will adversely affect many people who have come to rely on Google.  What they will do remains to be seen.

No doubt, you are hoping that I will be angry with Beijing if my access is further cut or reduced.  No doubt, you hope that this will help ferment discord among the Chinese people as well as ex-pats in China to begin attaining the long dreamed of American goal of bringing democracy to China.  You are living in a fantasy world if that is what you are hoping for.

In China you  will be criticized for your arrogance for not playing by the rules that you agreed to play by in the beginning.  You will be criticized for your arrogance in attempting to interfere in the internal policies of China.  Of course, by wanting to stay in China for other business interests you demonstrate that your dedication to capitalism is much stronger than your dedication to so called “human rights.”  That is called hypocrisy.

Share This Post

The Shot Heard Around the World

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010
This entry is part 3 of 6 in the series China

Google – the Internet Giant – took a shot at Beijing last week.  Whether that shot will start a war is doubtful.   One thing is certain:  It has brought out all the pundits – the China haters and detractors vs. the China defenders – around the world.  Main stream media opinions and editorials abound with everyone attempting to offer their ‘expert opinions.’  Bloggers went to work immediately tossing in their informed and uninformed two cents worth.

Knowing China and knowing about China are two different things.  Those who know about China have gotten the majority of their information from the  Western main stream media, which has a bias against China and from human rights activists who, without a doubt, have a bone to pick with China.

Those who know China are in a different basket.  They have lived and worked in China.  They have chosen to set aside their preconceived notions about China and experience the true China.  I am one of those people, arriving in China after experiencing Asian culture in other countries for 7 years, in August, 2007.

Google got their ‘corporate panties in a wad’ when someone or some entity  allegedly hacked into alleged dissenters e-mail accounts.  The Western inference is that the Beijing is either directly or indirectly responsible for the hacking’s.  My university students came up with a list of other suspects as well – which everyone else seems to be ignoring.  “They could have been sponsored by America wanting to embarrass China” said one student.  “Google people could have done it for business reasons or to try to put pressure on the government” said another student.  Another student posited that “Tibet and Dali Lama could have done it to put focus on their stupid complaints.”  Yet another student posited that “some dissidents could have done it to make them look good for America and bring attention to what they see as problems.” (more…)

Share This Post

Google v. China: 0 – 1

Friday, January 15th, 2010
This entry is part 1 of 6 in the series China

Google, the Internet Giant decided to take on China this week.  Speculation is that Google was put up to it by Washington.  Human rights advocates are cheering on Google.  Ex-pat Chinese dissidents are cheering on Google.   Some of the Chinese are cheering on Google.   Beijing, however, is controlling the game.

Google’s first complaint was that some e-mail accounts purportedly owned or used by internal and external dissidents were hacked into.  That is a valid complaint and should be properly investigated.

If the hacking was done by individuals, then most certainly all applicable laws should be utilized to punish those responsible.  If the hacking was done by, or at the bequest of Beijing, that raises other issues.

The US has an array of laws that allow, and disallow the government to snoop on both Americans and foreigners – all in the name of “national security.”   We know that America does it, regardless of what the laws are  – typically after the fact, and only after great pressure is brought on the government to confess its misdeeds.  What we do not know about are all the details about the “hidden espionage” and “hidden national security” fronts that the US utilizes to gain information about its own, and other people.  It happens.  Everyone knows it happens.  The problem is that nothing can be proven conclusively.

If you are a liberal, shame on America for doing those things.   If you are a conservative, then ‘good on America’ for doing this because after all, national security trumps individual privacy and rights.  We know this because 58% of the American public supports in torture to obtain information about terrorism and anti-American activities.

Beijing does things as quietly as Washington tries to do things.  There is the possibility that Beijing has either engaged in the hacking of accounts or allowed / instructed others to do so.  Like America, they engage in such activities for “national security.”  For Washington to criticize Beijing for doing that is hypocritical.   Why should Beijing be held to a higher standard than what Washington holds itself to? (more…)

Share This Post