Posts Tagged ‘dissidents’

The Shot Heard Around the World

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010
This entry is part 3 of 6 in the series China

Google – the Internet Giant – took a shot at Beijing last week.  Whether that shot will start a war is doubtful.   One thing is certain:  It has brought out all the pundits – the China haters and detractors vs. the China defenders – around the world.  Main stream media opinions and editorials abound with everyone attempting to offer their ‘expert opinions.’  Bloggers went to work immediately tossing in their informed and uninformed two cents worth.

Knowing China and knowing about China are two different things.  Those who know about China have gotten the majority of their information from the  Western main stream media, which has a bias against China and from human rights activists who, without a doubt, have a bone to pick with China.

Those who know China are in a different basket.  They have lived and worked in China.  They have chosen to set aside their preconceived notions about China and experience the true China.  I am one of those people, arriving in China after experiencing Asian culture in other countries for 7 years, in August, 2007.

Google got their ‘corporate panties in a wad’ when someone or some entity  allegedly hacked into alleged dissenters e-mail accounts.  The Western inference is that the Beijing is either directly or indirectly responsible for the hacking’s.  My university students came up with a list of other suspects as well – which everyone else seems to be ignoring.  “They could have been sponsored by America wanting to embarrass China” said one student.  “Google people could have done it for business reasons or to try to put pressure on the government” said another student.  Another student posited that “Tibet and Dali Lama could have done it to put focus on their stupid complaints.”  Yet another student posited that “some dissidents could have done it to make them look good for America and bring attention to what they see as problems.” (more…)

Share This Post

Google v. China: 0 – 1

Friday, January 15th, 2010
This entry is part 1 of 6 in the series China

Google, the Internet Giant decided to take on China this week.  Speculation is that Google was put up to it by Washington.  Human rights advocates are cheering on Google.  Ex-pat Chinese dissidents are cheering on Google.   Some of the Chinese are cheering on Google.   Beijing, however, is controlling the game.

Google’s first complaint was that some e-mail accounts purportedly owned or used by internal and external dissidents were hacked into.  That is a valid complaint and should be properly investigated.

If the hacking was done by individuals, then most certainly all applicable laws should be utilized to punish those responsible.  If the hacking was done by, or at the bequest of Beijing, that raises other issues.

The US has an array of laws that allow, and disallow the government to snoop on both Americans and foreigners – all in the name of “national security.”   We know that America does it, regardless of what the laws are  – typically after the fact, and only after great pressure is brought on the government to confess its misdeeds.  What we do not know about are all the details about the “hidden espionage” and “hidden national security” fronts that the US utilizes to gain information about its own, and other people.  It happens.  Everyone knows it happens.  The problem is that nothing can be proven conclusively.

If you are a liberal, shame on America for doing those things.   If you are a conservative, then ‘good on America’ for doing this because after all, national security trumps individual privacy and rights.  We know this because 58% of the American public supports in torture to obtain information about terrorism and anti-American activities.

Beijing does things as quietly as Washington tries to do things.  There is the possibility that Beijing has either engaged in the hacking of accounts or allowed / instructed others to do so.  Like America, they engage in such activities for “national security.”  For Washington to criticize Beijing for doing that is hypocritical.   Why should Beijing be held to a higher standard than what Washington holds itself to? (more…)

Share This Post